Treatment of hyperprolactinemia in women: A Position Statement from the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM).

Dopamine agonists are the first line of treatment for patients with symptomatic hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinomas and in those with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Treatment with these agents is effective in 80%-90% of the cases. Infertility treatment of patients with hyperprolactinemia is also carried out with dopamine agonists, aiming for the normalization of prolactin levels. The risk of symptomatic growth of prolactinomas during pregnancy is dependent on the tumor's size, duration of previous treatments, and prolactin levels. Notably, the corresponding risk is relatively low in cases of microprolactinomas (<5%). Remission of hyperprolactinemia occurs in about 30% of the patients after drug treatment and may also occur after pregnancy and menopause. The use of some drugs, such as antidepressants and antipsychotics, is a frequent cause of hyperprolactinemia, and managing this occurrence involves unique considerations. This position statement by the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) addresses the recommendations for measurement of serum prolactin levels and the investigations of symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia in women.

Diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia in women: A Position Statement from the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM).

Hyperprolactinemia is a frequent cause of menstrual irregularity, galactorrhea, hypogonadism, and infertility. The most common etiologies of hyperprolactinemia can be classified as physiological, pharmacological, and pathological. Among pathological conditions, it is essential to distinguish prolactinomas from other tumors and pituitary lesions presenting with hyperprolactinemia due to pituitary stalk disconnection. Proper investigation considering clinical data, laboratory tests, and, if necessary, imaging evaluation, is important to identify the correctcause of hyperprolactinemia and manage the patient properly. This position statement by the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and Brazilian Societyof Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) addresses the recommendations for measurement of serum prolactin levels and the investigations of symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia and medication-induced hyperprolactinemia in women.

Diffusion-weighted imaging does not seem to be a predictor of consistency in pituitary adenomas.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the usefulness of T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences in predicting the consistency of macroadenomas. In addition, to determine their values ​​as prognostic factors of surgical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with pituitary macroadenoma and surgical indication were included. All patients underwent pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that included the sequences T1WI before and after contrast administration and DWI with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Post-surgical MRI was performed at least 3 months after surgery. The consistency of the macroadenomas was evaluated at surgery, and they were grouped into soft and intermediate/hard adenomas. Mean ADC values, signal on T1WI and the ratio of tumor ADC values ​​to pons (ADCR) were compared with tumor consistency and grade of surgical resection. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were included. A softened consistency was found at surgery in 53 patients and hardened in 27 patients. The median ADC in the soft consistency group was 0.532 × 10-3 mm2/sec (0.306 - 1.096 × 10-3 mm2/sec), and in the intermediate/hard consistency group was 0.509 × 10-3 mm2/sec (0.308 - 0.818 × 10-3 mm2/sec). There was no significant difference between the median values ​​of ADC, ADCR and signal on T1W between the soft and hard tumor groups, or between patients with and without tumor residue. CONCLUSION: Our results did not show usefulness of the DWI and T1WI for assessing the consistency of pituitary macroadenomas, nor as a predictor of the degree of surgical resection.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant). AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly. EXPERT OPINION: Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.

New Treatments for Acromegaly in Development.

Acromegaly treatment has greatly evolved in recent decades, but there are still patients whose acromegaly is not controlled with currently available treatments, and there is a need to improve the treatment burden. Fortunately, there are new treatments under development that may increase treatment efficacy and convenience.

Refractory somatotroph adenomas.

Somatotroph adenomas are usually controlled with standard therapy, which can include surgery, medical treatment and radiotherapy. Some tumors have a more aggressive behavior and are refractory to standard therapy. In this review, we summarize the phenotype of these tumors and the current options for their management.

Importance of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with acromegaly and correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance findings.

INTRODUCTION: Arterial hypertension (AH) is prevalent in acromegaly, but few studies using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24 h-ABPM) suggest that its frequency may be different from office blood pressure (OBP). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is one of the most frequent cardiac abnormalities. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold standard to evaluate the heart. OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of AH when measured by 24 h-ABPM and by OBP and to correlate BP with cardiac mass. METHODS: Patients over 18 years of age with acromegaly underwent OBP evaluation and were later referred to the 24 h-ABPM. Treatment-naïve patients were submitted to CMR. RESULTS: We evaluated 96 patients. From 29 non hypertensive patients by OBP, 9 had AH on 24 h-ABPM. In the group of patients with a previous diagnosis of AH by OBP, 25 had controlled BP and 42 had abnormal BP on 24 h-ABPM, when analyzed by OBP there were 28 with controlled BP. We observed a positive correlation between diastolic BP measured in 24 h-ABPM and IGF-I levels, but we did not observe the same correlation with age, sex, body mass index and GH levels. The CMR was performed in 11 patients. We found a positive correlation of left ventricular mass (LVM) and BP of 24 h-ABPM. In contrast, there was no correlation of OBP with CMR parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We observed, that 24 h-ABPM in acromegaly allows the diagnosis of AH in some patients with normal BP in OBP and also to allow a better treatment. 24 h-ABPM shows a better correlation with VM by CMR.

miR-383-5p, miR-181a-5p, and miR-181b-5p as Predictors of Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a chronic systemic disease caused in the vast majority of cases by growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenoma, with surgery being the first-line treatment. When a cure is not attained with surgery, first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) are the most common medication prescribed. Predictors of response to fg-SRLs have been studied; however, they cannot fully predict the response to fg-SRL. MicroRNAs are small RNAs, the main role of which is messenger RNA (mRNA) post-transcriptional regulation. This study aimed to identify the microRNAs involved in resistance to treatment with fg-SRLs in acromegaly. Ten patients with acromegaly undergoing treatment with fg-SRLs were selected to undergo miRNA sequencing: five controlled and five uncontrolled with treatment. Bioinformatic analysis was performed to detect differentially expressed miRNAs. Then, the same 10 samples were used for validation by qPCR and an additional 22 samples were analyzed, totaling 32 samples. e We found 59 differentially expressed miRNAs in the first analysis. miR-181a-5p and miR-181b-5p were downregulated, and miR-383-5p was upregulated in the uncontrolled group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of miR-383-5p showed an NPV of 84.3% and a PPV of 84.5%. In summary, miR-181a-5p, miR-181b-5p, and miR-383-5p are biomarkers of response to fg-SRLs, and they can be used individually or included in prediction models as tools to guide clinical decisions.

Characterization of sporadic somatotropinomas with high GIP receptor expression.

PURPOSE: To analyze the expression of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) in somatotropinomas specimens and compare clinical, biochemical, radiological, therapeutic, molecular, and pathological data among those who overexpressed (GIPR +) and those who did not overexpress (GIPR - ) GIPR. METHODS: Clinical, biochemical, radiological, molecular, and pathological data were collected. GNAS1 sequencing was performed with the Sanger method. Protein expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 and CAM 5.2 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to analyze the mRNA expression of GIPR with the TaqMan® method. Positive expression was considered when the fold change (FC) was above 17.2 (GIPR +). RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (54% female) were included. Eighteen tumors (24%) were GIPR + . Gsp mutation was detected in 30 tumors (40%). GIPR + tumors were more frequently densely granulated adenomas (83% vs 47%, p = 0.028). There was no difference in clinical, biochemical, radiological, therapeutic (surgical cure or response to medical therapy), or other pathological features between GIPR + and GIPR -  tumors. Twenty-eight out of 56 (50%) GIPR -  tumors harbored a gsp mutation, whereas two out of 18 (11%) GIPR + tumors harbored a gsp mutation (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We described, for the first time, that GIPR + and gsp mutations are not mutually exclusive, but gsp mutations are less common in GIPR + tumors. GIPR + and GIPR -  tumors have similar clinical, biochemical, radiological, therapeutic, and pathological features, with the exception of a high frequency of densely granulated adenomas among GIPR + tumors.

MicroRNA in Acromegaly: Involvement in the Pathogenesis and in the Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands.

Acromegaly is a chronic and systemic disease due to excessive growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor type I caused, in the vast majority of cases, by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. About 40% of these tumors have somatic mutations in the stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit 1 gene. The pathogenesis of the remaining tumors, however, is still not fully comprehended. Surgery is the first-line therapy for these tumors, and first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are the most prescribed medications in patients who are not cured by surgery. MicroRNAs are small, non-coding RNAs that control the translation of many mRNAs, and are involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Differentially expressed miRNAs can explain differences in the pathogenesis of acromegaly and tumor resistance. In this review, we focus on the most validated miRNAs, which are mainly involved in acromegaly's tumorigenesis and fg-SRL resistance, as well as in circulating miRNAs in acromegaly.

Acromegaly and Colorectal Neoplasm: An Update.

Acromegaly is a systemic disease caused by excessive inappropriate secretion of GH and IGF-I levels, resulting in many systemic complications, including cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic diseases, and a possible increased risk of some neoplasias. Although many studies on acromegaly and cancer remain uncertain, most data indicate that colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increased in this population. The exact mechanism involved in the role of GH-IGF-I axis in CRC has not been fully explained, yet it is associated with local and circulating effects of GH and IGF-I on the colon, promoting angiogenesis, cell proliferation, risk of mutation, inhibition of tumor-suppressor genes and apoptosis, thus facilitating a tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, population-based studies present controversial findings on CRC incidence and mortality. All worldwide guidelines and expert consensuses agree with the need for colonoscopic screening and surveillance in acromegaly, although there is no consensus regarding the best period to do this. This review aims to analyze the existing data on CRC and acromegaly, exploring its pathophysiology, epidemiological studies and their limitations, colonic polyp characteristics, overall cancer and CRC incidences and mortality, risk factors for colon cancer pathophysiology, and recommendation guideline aspects.

Innovative therapeutics in acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a systemic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality that can be prevented with adequate disease control. Three modalities of treatment (surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy) are available; however, a significant proportion of patients still maintain disease activity despite treatment. Therefore, there is a need for innovations in the treatment of acromegaly that include changes in the current trial and error approach and the development of new drugs. In this review, we summarize the recent innovations in the treatment of acromegaly and address the future perspectives in this field.

Approach to the Patient: Differential Diagnosis of Cystic Sellar Lesions.

Cystic lesions arising in the sellar region are not uncommon and encompass cystic pituitary adenomas, Rathke cleft cysts, craniopharyngiomas, and arachnoid cysts. Their clinical presentation may be similar, including headache, visual field defects, and anterior pituitary hormone deficits, which makes differential diagnosis challenging. On the other hand, imaging features may indicate certain pathologies. In this approach to the patient, we describe the case of a patient who presented with right temporal hemianopsia and a sellar/suprasellar cystic lesion, which was determined to be Rathke cleft cyst. We discuss the imaging characteristics that may suggest a particular diagnosis between Rathke cleft cyst, cystic pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, and arachnoid cyst and propose a flowchart for aiding in the imaging differential diagnosis.

Pituitary MRI Standard and Advanced Sequences: Role in the Diagnosis and Characterization of Pituitary Adenomas.

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) represent the most frequently found lesions in the sellar region; however, several other lesions may be encountered in this region, such as meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, and aneurysms. High-quality imaging is fundamental for diagnosis, characterization, and guidance of treatment planning of PAs. Sellar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of lesions in the sella turcica. The sellar MRI standard protocol includes coronal and sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo sequencing with and without gadolinium-based contrast agent and coronal T2-weighted (T2w) fast-spin echo sequencing. A systematic MRI approach to the pituitary region generally provides information that includes the size and shape of the PA, the presence of cysts or hemorrhage within the tumor, its relationship with the optic pathways and surrounding structures, potential cavernous sinus invasion, sphenoid sinus pneumatization type, and differential diagnosis with other sellar lesions. The standard protocol is sufficient for the evaluation of most cases; however, some advanced techniques (susceptibility imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, 3D T2w high-resolution sequences, magnetic resonance elastography, perfusion-weighted imaging) may render additional information, which may be important for some cases. In this "approach to the patient" manuscript, we will discuss the use of standard and advanced MRI sequences in the diagnosis and characterization of PAs, including MRI features associated with treatment response that may aid in presurgical evaluation and planning, and red flags that may point to an alternative diagnosis.

The Future of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

Currently, the first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs), octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel, are the mainstays of acromegaly treatment and achieve biochemical control in approximately 40% of patients and tumor shrinkage in over 60% of patients. Pasireotide, a second-generation SRL, shows higher efficacy with respect to both biochemical control and tumor shrinkage but has a worse safety profile. In this review, we discuss the future perspectives of currently available SRLs, focusing on the use of biomarkers of response and precision medicine, new formulations of these SRLs and new drugs, which are under development. Precision medicine, which is based on biomarkers of response to treatment, will help guide the decision-making process by allowing physicians to choose the appropriate drug for each patient and improving response rates. New formulations of available SRLs, such as oral, subcutaneous depot, and nasal octreotide, may improve patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life since there will be more options available that better suit each patient. Finally, new drugs, such as paltusotine, somatropin, ONO-5788, and ONO-ST-468, may improve treatment adherence and present higher efficacy than currently available drugs.

gsp Mutation Is Not a Molecular Biomarker of Long-Term Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: It is still controversial if activating mutations in the stimulatory G-protein α subunit (gsp mutation) are a biomarker of response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) treatment in acromegaly. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether gsp mutation predicts long-term response to fg-SRL treatment and to characterize the phenotype of patients harboring gsp mutations. METHODS: GNAS1 sequencing was performed by Sanger. SST2 and SST5 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real-time RT-PCR. The cytokeratin granulation pattern was evaluated by IHC. Biochemical control was defined as GH < 1.0 ng/mL and normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels. RESULTS: gsp mutation was found in 54 out of 136 patients evaluated. Biochemical control with fg-SRL treatment was similar in gsp+ and gsp- patients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.219). Tumors harboring gsp mutation were smaller (p = 0.035) and had a lower chance of invading cavernous sinuses (p = 0.001). SST5 protein (p = 0.047) and mRNA (p = 0.013) expression levels were higher in wild-type tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest series available in the literature, we concluded that gsp is not a molecular biomarker of response to fg-SRL treatment in acromegaly. However, the importance of its negative association with cavernous sinus invasion and SST5 expression needs to be further investigated.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone-secreting pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor associated with pituitary hyperplasia and somatotropinoma.

Acromegaly caused by ectopic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting tumor is exceedingly rare. We report a case of acromegaly secondary to GHRH secretion by an incidentally diagnosed pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and review 47 similar cases in literature. A 22-year-old male patient presented with symptoms of pituitary apoplexy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed apoplexy of a pituitary adenoma. Routinely prior to surgery, a chest radiography was performed which revealed a mass in the left lung. During investigation, the patient was diagnosed with metastatic GHRH-secreting pulmonary NET. In retrospect, it was noted that the patient had pituitary hyperplasia 20 months prior to the MRI which showed the presence of a pituitary adenoma. The histological findings confirmed somatotroph hyperplasia adjacent to somatotropinoma. This case suggests that GHRH secretion can be associated with pituitary hyperplasia, which may be followed by pituitary adenoma formation.

GH and IGF-I levels and tumor shrinkage in response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: a comparative study between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil.

PURPOSE: To compare biochemical and tumor response rates between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil after primary and adjuvant therapy with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) in acromegaly. METHODS: Patients were classified as non-responders (NR), partial responders (PR), and full responders (FR) to 12-month SRL therapy according to: [criteria A] normal IGF-I and random GH (rGH) < 1 ng/mL (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I and/or rGH (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I and rGH (NR); [criteria B] normal IGF-I (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I (NR). Tumor shrinkage <20% defined poor responders (tPR) and ≥ 20% good responders (tGR). RESULTS: We studied 219 acromegaly patients (59% women, age 43.1 ± 13.9 years; 73 from Center I and 146 from Center II). After SRL therapy, the proportion of FR, PR, and NR by criteria A and B was 30.2 vs 49.1%, 52.8 vs 21.2% and 17 vs 29.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Considering criteria A or B separately, there was no difference in the proportion of FR, PR and NR between two centers. However, when comparing criteria A and B, the Center I showed a difference of 30.9% in classification of FR in relation to 13.2% observed in Center II (p = 0.006). tGR were 51.4% of patients, with no differences between the centers. CONCLUSIONS: IGF-I alone significantly increased positive response rates to SRLs, whereas the inclusion of rGH levels into therapeutic decision might lead to a significant increment on the costs of acromegaly management.

Identification of mutant K-RAS in pituitary macroadenoma.

PURPOSE: RAS genes are among the most frequently mutated genes in cancer, where their mutation frequency varies according to the distinct RAS isoforms and tumour types. Despite occurring more prevalent in malignant tumours, RAS mutations were also observed in few benign tumours. Pituitary adenomas are examples of benign tumours which vary in size and aggressiveness. The present study was performed to investigate, via liquid biopsy and tissue analysis, the presence of K-RAS mutations in a pituitary macroadenoma. METHODS: Molecular analysis was performed to investigate K-RAS mutations using the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method by evaluating both plasma (liquid biopsy) and the solid tumour of a patient diagnosed with a giant clinically non-functioning pituitary tumour. RESULTS: The patient underwent surgical resection due to visual loss, and the histopathological analysis showed a gonadotrophic pituitary macroadenoma. The molecular analysis revealed the presence of mutant K-RAS both in the plasma and in the tumour tissue which, to our knowledge, has not been previously reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the exceptional capacity of the digital PCR in detecting low frequency mutations (below 1%), since we detected, for the first time, K-RAS mutations in pituitary macroadenoma. The potential impact of K-RAS mutations in these tumours should be further investigated.